Competition has intensified dramatically over the past few decades, in particular with the recent economical correction that the world is experiencing. This has been a direct result of globalisation, and with it has brought increasing pressure upon businesses in most major industries, to perform at ever more efficient and effective levels in order to remain competitive and ethical.
The need to be more effective and efficient has become a continuous cycle of change, and the reliance on stability and market dominance, has become an obsolete business strategy. Government regulations such as labour, environmental, health and safety requirements, driven by the increased demand for localised socio-political and socio-economic transformation within third world countries, together with the expectations arising from the investment fraternities around risk management, and the inevitable Corporate Social Responsibilities, have placed mounting pressure on Mining Companies, to review People Practices and Standards.
These expectation changes and increased demands have inevitably resulted in a steady, yet profound drive towards new standards to which Capital Projects will need to align the People component within the various Project Study Phases. Operational Readiness from a people perspective is one of the most critical success factors of any Capital Project.
Over the next few months, a number of short articles will be published addressing this theme, and in particular issues pertaining to:
- The role of an Independent Technical Review for people related issues
- The various Project Study Phases and their contribution to People compliances issues
- What constitutes an appropriate Framework for People Studies within the various phases of Capital Project Studies?
- The Art of fluctuating Confusion with People issues: Capital studies, Operational Readiness & Steady State
- Integrating People Legal Compliance during project design
- The role of technical design parameters in developing and designing people practices